0.02/0.09 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.02/0.09 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 1440 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 180 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 04:15:08 EDT 2024 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.40 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nNIJODucTu/E---3.1_6562.p 0.15/0.43 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA. 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh2lt with 720s (4) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # sh2lt with pid 6642 completed with status 0 0.15/0.43 # Result found by sh2lt 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA. 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh2lt with 720s (4) cores 0.15/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.15/0.43 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 720 seconds (720 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 389s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh2lt with 73s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 65s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting lpo1_def_fix with 65s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # sh2lt with pid 6652 completed with status 0 0.15/0.43 # Result found by sh2lt 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA. 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh2lt with 720s (4) cores 0.15/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.15/0.43 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 720 seconds (720 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 389s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh2lt with 73s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.15/0.43 0.15/0.43 # Proof found! 0.15/0.43 # SZS status Theorem 0.15/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_22, type, epred1_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o). 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_23, type, epred2_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o). 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_24, type, esk1_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i). 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_25, type, epred3_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o). 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_26, type, epred4_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o). 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_27, type, epred5_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o). 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_28, type, epred6_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o). 0.15/0.43 thf(cTHM122_pme, conjecture, ?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ X4)=>(X3 @ X4)))<=(X1 @ X2 @ X3)))&![X5:$i > $o, X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o]:((((X1 @ X5 @ X6)&(X1 @ X6 @ X7))=>(X1 @ X5 @ X7))))&![X5:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X5 @ X5)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nNIJODucTu/E---3.1_6562.p', cTHM122_pme)). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X3)=>![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ X4)=>(X3 @ X4)))))&![X5:$i > $o, X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o]:((((X1 @ X5 @ X6)&(X1 @ X6 @ X7))=>(X1 @ X5 @ X7))))&![X5:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X5 @ X5))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM122_pme])])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X16:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:((((((X16 @ (epred3_1 @ X16) @ (epred4_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (epred1_1 @ X16) @ (epred2_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16)))&((X16 @ (epred4_1 @ X16) @ (epred5_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (epred1_1 @ X16) @ (epred2_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16))))&(~(X16 @ (epred3_1 @ X16) @ (epred5_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (epred1_1 @ X16) @ (epred2_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16))))&(((((X16 @ (epred3_1 @ X16) @ (epred4_1 @ X16))|(epred1_1 @ X16 @ (esk1_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16)))&((X16 @ (epred4_1 @ X16) @ (epred5_1 @ X16))|(epred1_1 @ X16 @ (esk1_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16))))&(~(X16 @ (epred3_1 @ X16) @ (epred5_1 @ X16))|(epred1_1 @ X16 @ (esk1_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16))))&((((X16 @ (epred3_1 @ X16) @ (epred4_1 @ X16))|~(epred2_1 @ X16 @ (esk1_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16)))&((X16 @ (epred4_1 @ X16) @ (epred5_1 @ X16))|~(epred2_1 @ X16 @ (esk1_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16))))&(~(X16 @ (epred3_1 @ X16) @ (epred5_1 @ X16))|~(epred2_1 @ X16 @ (esk1_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred5_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred2_1 @ X1))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred3_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred2_1 @ X1))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred2_1 @ X1))|~((X1 @ (epred3_1 @ X1) @ (epred5_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (((epred5_1 @ $eq)=(epred4_1 @ $eq))|((epred1_1 @ $eq)=(epred2_1 @ $eq))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_3])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (((epred4_1 @ $eq)=(epred3_1 @ $eq))|((epred1_1 @ $eq)=(epred2_1 @ $eq))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_4])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_1 @ $eq)=(epred2_1 @ $eq)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])])]), c_0_7])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X58:$i]:(((epred1_1 @ $eq @ X58)<=>(epred2_1 @ $eq @ X58))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred3_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))|(epred1_1 @ X1 @ (esk1_1 @ X1))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred3_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))|~((epred2_1 @ X1 @ (esk1_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((epred1_1 @ X1 @ (esk1_1 @ X1))|~((X1 @ (epred3_1 @ X1) @ (epred5_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:((~((X1 @ (epred3_1 @ X1) @ (epred5_1 @ X1)))|~((epred2_1 @ X1 @ (esk1_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred5_1 @ X1))|(epred1_1 @ X1 @ (esk1_1 @ X1))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:(((epred2_1 @ $eq @ X4)|~((epred1_1 @ $eq @ X4)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (((epred4_1 @ $eq)=(epred3_1 @ $eq))|(epred1_1 @ $eq @ (esk1_1 @ $eq))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_10])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (((epred4_1 @ $eq)=(epred3_1 @ $eq))|~((epred2_1 @ $eq @ (esk1_1 @ $eq)))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_11])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_1 @ $eq @ (esk1_1 @ $eq))|((epred5_1 @ $eq)!=(epred3_1 @ $eq))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_12])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (((epred5_1 @ $eq)!=(epred3_1 @ $eq))|~((epred2_1 @ $eq @ (esk1_1 @ $eq)))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_13])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred5_1 @ X1))|~((epred2_1 @ X1 @ (esk1_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (((epred5_1 @ $eq)=(epred4_1 @ $eq))|(epred1_1 @ $eq @ (esk1_1 @ $eq))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_14])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ((epred4_1 @ $eq)=(epred3_1 @ $eq)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), c_0_17])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ((epred5_1 @ $eq)!=(epred3_1 @ $eq)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_18]), c_0_19])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (((epred5_1 @ $eq)=(epred4_1 @ $eq))|~((epred2_1 @ $eq @ (esk1_1 @ $eq)))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_20])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, (epred1_1 @ $eq @ (esk1_1 @ $eq)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22]), c_0_23])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ~((epred2_1 @ $eq @ (esk1_1 @ $eq))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_22]), c_0_23])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_25]), c_0_26]), ['proof']). 0.15/0.43 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.15/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 1 0.15/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses : 9 0.15/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9 0.15/0.43 # Processed clauses : 69 0.15/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 1 0.15/0.43 # ...subsumed : 9 0.15/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 59 0.15/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.15/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.15/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 7 0.15/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 8 0.15/0.43 # Generated clauses : 121 0.15/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 86 0.15/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.15/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4 0.15/0.43 # Paramodulations : 10 0.15/0.43 # Factorizations : 0 0.15/0.43 # NegExts : 4 0.15/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.15/0.43 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.15/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 9 0.15/0.43 # ...of those cached : 7 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 25 0.15/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4 0.15/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.15/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 3 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 18 0.15/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 34 0.15/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 95 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 34 0.15/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 118 0.15/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 15 0.15/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33 0.15/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 2 0.15/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.15/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0 0.15/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 25049 0.15/0.43 # Search garbage collected termcells : 204 0.15/0.43 0.15/0.43 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.011 s 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.002 s 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.013 s 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1872 pages 0.15/0.43 0.15/0.43 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.040 s 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.007 s 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.047 s 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages 0.15/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting 0.15/0.43 % E exiting 0.15/0.43 EOF